Money Stuff 2.0: Maybe Augur can be a thing now | Cboe withdraws VanEck Bitcoin ETF, but the asset manager is not giving up hope
|Jan 23||Public post|| 1|
“The Bitcoin ETF filing has been temporarily withdrawn. We are actively working with regulators and major market participants to build appropriate market structure frameworks for a Bitcoin ETF and digital assets in general. Will keep you updated.” — Gabor Gurbacs, Director of Digital Assets Strategy at VanEck
The Money 2.0 Stuff: Maybe Augur can be a thing now
The US has finally made all forms of online gambling that involve interstate transactions fully illegal, in accordance with the Wire Act of 1961. Specifically, the ruling specifies:
The ruling will not affect online gambling in which the wagers are placed from within a state's borders, however this suggests casinos will have to have both a physical presence and a secure system in place to ensure that no bets originate from outside of the state. It's unknown at this time how the industry will navigate that issue in a way that satisfies the revised federal regulations.
While Bitcoin-based grey market gambling sites (e.g. Nitrogen) have existed since Bitcoin’s launch, the ruling does make cryptocurrency enthusiasts wonder whether this ruling can serve as a catalyst for adoption for more uncensorable alternatives like Augur. Going into the year, I was fairly bullish on Augur, noting:
I suspect it will be the breakout dApp of 2019 ... My bullishness is due to (1) a full year elapsing with a working product (2) improved UX/choice of clients (3) increased brand awareness (4) demand in the market for a non-custodial prediction market (5) stable-coin integration and (6) better market-making and liquidity provisioning.
I was most skeptical that sports wagers would find their way to Augur given many viable alternatives. Augur seemed best positioned to capture a share of prop bets with its killer improvement giving the users the ability to create arbitrary markets. Noting some of the difficulties in historical adoption, some of this has already been alleviated with the launch of products like Veil (see The Block's Steven Zheng's exclusive interview with the team).
It's no secret that dApps have yet to see significant user traction —notional value of interest on Augur is still < $2m. One of the many reasons for this is because outside of international settlement and value transfer, there are few users that need a product badly enough to overcome many of the frictions in usability.
It's also unclear how this sort of regulation affects operators like Augur: after all, the team is US-based, public, and active on social media. While the project originally had a kill-switch built in, it was destroyed a few weeks after launch.
While the team behind Augur would argue that they simply offer a protocol and don't endorse any markets created on the platform, it's no secret that wagering on sports, political events, etc. without fearing arrest is one of the major draws. Indeed, the largest markets on Augur are focused on political events and cryptocurrency speculation.
To this day, the Augur site contains a PGP-signed message, and as of today, it still reads:
As of January 2nd, 2019, the Forecast Foundation has not been contacted by any agency anywhere in the world in a way which requires that contact not to be disclosed. The Forecast Foundation will publicly disclose any sort of inquiry from government agencies that falls outside the scope of regular business operations.
It will be interesting to see how this develops. We’ll be closely watching open interest over the coming months.
The BIS Finally Writes a Decent Paper
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has come out with another paper, this time focusing on a critique of Bitcoin's Proof of Work consensus. The Block's Larry Cermak offers a summary:
Auer argues that Satoshi’s updating process has two limitations: (1) proof-of-work axiomatically requires high transaction costs to ensure payment finality (2) the system cannot generate transaction fees in line with the goal of guaranteeing payment security.
This line of thinking isn't new—in fact, it's been historically debated amongst the Bitcoin community, serving as one of several arguments against the proposal to increase block size. Bitcoin security is derived from two sources: the block reward (new issuance) that comes out every 10 minutes and the transaction fees that miners collect. Given Bitcoin's fixed supply and every-four-year halvenings, the block reward eventually runs out, forcing all security to be provided for by sufficiently high transaction fees.
With this in mind, there are two dominant paradigms that emerged. The first, primarily explored by the Bitcoin Cash community, is focused on an unbounded block size that could include enough transactions to make up for potentially low fees in volume. The second, Bitcoin's current design, is focused on a limited block size that limits the number of transactions in each block, increasing the average transaction fee to sufficiently high levels that a satisfactory threshold is reached.
While many people worry about the potential for high fees to affect usability of the network, Bitcoiners are optimistic that most Bitcoin use will move off chain (to protocols like the Lightning Network) before the block reward runs out. In this vision for the future, the base Bitcoin chain will primarily be used for extremely large transactions (where additional security is needed and paid for), e.g. inter-bank settlement.
While the answers to these questions have remained unclear for a long time, they've been hotly debated in the community.
Elites Prefer Blockchain to Bitcoin
In comments that are totally unsurprising, the private jet trotting attendees at Davos have indicated they still don't understand Bitcoin, with comments like:
Jeff Schumacher, founder of BCG Digital Ventures, said during a panel in Davos: "I do believe [bitcoin] will go to zero. I think it's a great technology but I don't believe it's a currency. It's not based on anything."
I wonder if anyone has told Jeff that virtually all currencies are faith-based. This isn't new—just one of many comments in a long list of historical comments that critics have made about the use of blockchains-as-currency, with Silver Lake co-founder Glen Hutchins expanding:
"I am much less interested in investing around bitcoin as a currency unit or a currency equivalent, or even the blockchain as an accounting ledger. I am thinking much more about the protocols. In other words, what is the underlying protocol going to do as a consequence of which, which tokens are valuable or not," Hutchins said.
Ignoring that the quote is mostly nonsensical, these are the types of high-level conversations people are having about blockchain technology at Davos. What else could you expect with a group of establishment elites who only have a 50,000 foot view of what's possible?
Other Stuff Happened
Cboe has withdrawn the VanEck Bitcoin ETF, much to the chagrin of cryptocurrency enthusiasts who were optimistic a government shutdown meant they'd have no choice but to accept it.
Bithumb, a Korean exchange more well-known for 2017's "kimchi premium" and allegations of wash trading is pursuing a US public listing via reverse takeover (RTO) in a move similar to Galaxy Digital's maneuver in Canada.
Anchorage, a custody platform backed by a16z, Khosla Ventures, and others has finally come out of stealth after over a year as custody margins have compressed across the board. It will be interesting to see their differentiation in a crowded field.
The Big Block
Cboe has withdrawn one of the most closely watched applications for an exchange traded fund tied to bitcoin, according to a filing.
Originally, VanEck, the asset manager, was looking to get an ETF off the ground alongside crypto firm SolidX. The two firms filed with the SEC last June to list the fund on Cboe Global Markets, one of the markets behind bitcoin futures in the U.S. Most recently, the SEC extended the comment period for the fund on December 6 and the market has been waiting for regulators to give the fund the green light to trade.
The SEC has shot down a number of crypto ETFs, citing fear of manipulation of exchanges trading spot bitcoin as well as a lack of liquidity in bitcoin markets.
In addition to VanEck, Bitwise has been looking to launch a fund tied to bitcoin. The asset manager filed its own Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this month.
Read More on The Block (2 Minutes)
Around The Block
Blockchain.com CEO on millennial uptake, institutional doubts and running the world’s largest crypto wallet provider
In an interview with The Block, Blockchain.com CEO Peter Smith pulled back the curtain. Over the past eight years, Smith has built out a crytpo-service empire that spans from ICO treasury management to raw class liquidity, custody, and research. At its core, of course, is its free wallet service, which hosts 32 million accounts storing Bitcoin, Stellar, Bitcoin cash, and Ethereum. Users can now also trade their cryptocurrencies; the company’s key to monetization amid its wider ambition to fix a financial system that it considers “broken.”
The Block caught up with Smith to talk Blockchain.com’s future clientele, who’s buying into a crypto-based economy, and the quirks that come with recruiting from Wall Street. — More
Ethereum Essentials: Node Nuances
This report explores the costs to run nodes for various users in the Ethereum ecosystem and how the cost tradeoffs impact trust. One of the bigger points of confusion surrounding Ethereum is the distinction between ‘full nodes’ and ‘archive nodes’. A full node is any computer or server that is connected to the Ethereum network, downloads the entire blockchain, validates the state to comply with the consensus mechanisms for the protocol, and can serve the network with data requests and block validation. — More
Andreessen Horowitz-backed Anchorage goes live with its new custody platform — More
EY Blockchain chief calls 2018 crypto bear market ‘the most predictable in years’ — More
Crypto exchange Seed CX aims to lure Wall Street by undercutting its behemoth rivals— More
Major crypto exchange takes key early step to public U.S. listing with reverse merger — More
Overstock’s Medici Ventures sees management change as tZERO launch draws near — More
The Nebulas blockchain project lays off 60% of its team — More
Founder of BCG Digital Ventures says he believes bitcoin will go to zero — More
BlackRock exec joins crypto startup Blockstack — More
A marketplace to let the biggest companies tokenize their IP is on its way — More